Italicized text was added to the original Title III Technical
Assistance
Manual through supplements issued in 1993 and 1994.
Regulatory references: Appendix A to 28 CFR Part 36.
Departures are permitted from particular requirements where
alternative designs and technologies will provide substantially
equivalent or greater access to and usability of the facility.
Will the Department tell me if my design is "equivalent"? No.
The ADA, like all other Federal civil rights laws, requires each
covered entity
to use its best professional judgment to comply with the statute and
the
implementing regulations. The Department of Justice does not have a
mechanism
to certify any specific variation from the standards as being
"equivalent." Proposed alternative designs, when supported by
available data, are not prohibited; but in any title III investigation
or
lawsuit, the covered entity would bear the burden of proving that any
alternative design provides equal or greater access.
ADAAG itself provides various examples of equivalent facilitation, i.e., acceptable deviations from the standards. For instance --
Are these the only places where equivalent facilitation can be used?
No. Departures from any provision in ADAAG are permitted as long as
equivalent access is provided. However, portable ramps are not
considered equivalent facilitation.
Is it permissible to deviate from the requirements for elements such as lavatories, operating controls and faucets, urinals, bathtubs, and shower stalls in order to follow State or local building code standards for these fixtures? Sometimes. Such deviations are permissible only if they provide access equal to or greater than that required by the ADA.